Comparison · Reliability Ranked

Nissan Juke vs Volvo C30

Side-by-side reliability, price, and known-issue comparison for used-car buyers. Composite scores come from TÜV (Germany), ADAC (pan-European), NHTSA (US-sold variants), and DVSA MOT (UK inspections).

N

Nissan Juke

2015–2017
Reliability composite
63
/ 100
Average
MOT + NHTSA
Estimated used price
€6,200–€10,700
Documented issues
0
Analyze a listing →Full reliability report →
⭐ Better composite reliability
V

Volvo C30

2011–2013
Reliability composite
74
/ 100
Good
MOT + NHTSA
Estimated used price
€5,400–€7,200
Documented issues
0
Analyze a listing →Full reliability report →

Bottom Line

The Volvo C30 wins on composite reliability across TÜV, ADAC, NHTSA, and DVSA MOT data — typically a sign of lower ownership risk and fewer recurring failure modes at age. The other car isn't necessarily wrong; check its issue list and price-to-condition ratio before deciding.

carVertical20% off for AutoFindr readers

Shortlisted both? Check each VIN before you buy

Reliability data tells you which model is the safer bet. A VIN history report tells you what happened to the individual car — accident and write-off records, mileage rollback, outstanding finance and theft checks.

Run a VIN history check →use code AUTOFINDR at checkoutor decode the VIN free first →

carVertical is our one disclosed affiliate partner — we earn a commission if you buy a report. It doesn't affect our reliability scores, which come from TÜV, ADAC, DVSA MOT and NHTSA data.

Deep dive →
Nissan Juke reliability
Deep dive →
Volvo C30 reliability