Reliability Report · Multi-Source Data

Toyota Yaris Design HEV Cvt Reliability

The Toyota Yaris Design HEV Cvt (current generation) scores 92/100 on our composite reliability index — excellent territory — drawn from DVSA, NHTSA data.

Composite Score
92
/ 100
Excellent
Sources: DVSA · NHTSA · latest 2026
Market Snapshot
Documented issues0
Listings in catalogue0
Found a listing?
Get a personalized risk + price verdict in 30 seconds.

Reliability by Source

Each independent organization measures reliability differently. TÜV reports inspection defect rates by age band. ADAC reports pan-European breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles. NHTSA aggregates US consumer complaints. DVSA MOT data is the UK fleet's annual safety inspection — every car 3+ years old. Lower variance across sources = higher confidence in the composite.

NHTSA (US Complaints)
Model years 2018–2020 · 2026 report · n=39
39 complaints across 3 sampled year(s); resolved model="YARIS"
View source ↗
84
/ 100
DVSA MOT (UK Inspections)
Model years 2019–2021 · 2024 report · n=22236
22,236 UK MOT tests · overall 3.5% fail rate vs UK fleet baseline
View source ↗
97
/ 100
DVSA MOT (UK Inspections)
Model years 2018–2020 · 2023 report · n=2386
2,386 UK MOT tests · overall 4.6% fail rate vs UK fleet baseline
View source ↗
93
/ 100

UK MOT Reliability Detail

Based on 22,236 MOT tests in the UK during the 2024reporting period. Score for each age band reflects this model's fail rate vs the UK-fleet baseline fail rate at the same age — a generation-aware metric.

Age 35 yrs
97
3.5% fail vs 10.9% fleet
22,236 tests

Most Common MOT Failure Categories

#1
Wipers
547
38.2%
#2
Condition
418
29.2%
#3
Windscreen
224
15.6%
#4
Tread depth
152
10.6%
#5
Shock absorbers
92
6.4%

Categories ranked across all MOT tests of this model in the UK during the 2024period. "Condition" covers cosmetic / wear issues; suspension and braking dominate the rest.

Compare Against Alternatives

See how the Toyota Yaris Design HEV Cvt stacks up against direct rivals — same segment, similar price band, side-by-side risk + reliability.

Open the comparison tool →