Reliability Report · Multi-Source Data

Toyota Alphard Reliability

The Toyota Alphard (current generation) scores 76/100 on our composite reliability index — good territory — drawn from DVSA data.

Composite Score
76
/ 100
Good
Sources: DVSA · latest 2024
Market Snapshot
Documented issues0
Listings in catalogue0
Found a listing?
Get a personalized risk + price verdict in 30 seconds.

Reliability by Source

Each independent organization measures reliability differently. TÜV reports inspection defect rates by age band. ADAC reports pan-European breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles. NHTSA aggregates US consumer complaints. DVSA MOT data is the UK fleet's annual safety inspection — every car 3+ years old. Lower variance across sources = higher confidence in the composite.

DVSA MOT (UK Inspections)
Model years 2004–2021 · 2024 report · n=18134
18,134 UK MOT tests · overall 18.1% fail rate vs UK fleet baseline
View source ↗
80
/ 100
DVSA MOT (UK Inspections)
Model years 2003–2020 · 2023 report · n=8299
8,299 UK MOT tests · overall 21.9% fail rate vs UK fleet baseline
View source ↗
72
/ 100

UK MOT Reliability Detail

Based on 18,134 MOT tests in the UK during the 2024reporting period. Score for each age band reflects this model's fail rate vs the UK-fleet baseline fail rate at the same age — a generation-aware metric.

Age 35 yrs
23
23.7% fail vs 10.9% fleet
2,113 tests
Age 69 yrs
60
24.1% fail vs 19.2% fleet
2,850 tests
Age 1014 yrs
99
9.0% fail vs 32.1% fleet
3,042 tests
Age 1520 yrs
91
18.0% fail vs 38.8% fleet
10,129 tests

Most Common MOT Failure Categories

#1
Ball joint dust cover
2,270
26.0%
#2
Linkage ball joint dust cover
2,125
24.3%
#3
Headlamp
1,926
22.0%
#4
Condition
1,307
14.9%
#5
Rear fog lamp
1,119
12.8%

Categories ranked across all MOT tests of this model in the UK during the 2024period. "Condition" covers cosmetic / wear issues; suspension and braking dominate the rest.

Compare Against Alternatives

See how the Toyota Alphard stacks up against direct rivals — same segment, similar price band, side-by-side risk + reliability.

Open the comparison tool →