Reliability Report · Multi-Source Data

Opel Crossland Reliability

The Opel Crossland (current generation) scores 62/100 on our composite reliability index — average territory — drawn from DVSA, TÜV data.

Composite Score
62
/ 100
Average
Sources: DVSA · TÜV · latest 2025
Market Snapshot
Documented issues0
Listings in catalogue0
Found a listing?
Get a personalized risk + price verdict in 30 seconds.

Reliability by Source

Each independent organization measures reliability differently. TÜV reports inspection defect rates by age band. ADAC reports pan-European breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles. NHTSA aggregates US consumer complaints. DVSA MOT data is the UK fleet's annual safety inspection — every car 3+ years old. Lower variance across sources = higher confidence in the composite.

TÜV (Germany)
All model years · 2025 report
HU defect rate (TÜV Report 2025): 2-3yr 10.4%
View source ↗
53
/ 100
DVSA MOT (UK Inspections)
Model years 2015–2021 · 2024 report · n=49132
49,132 UK MOT tests · overall 14.2% fail rate vs UK fleet baseline
View source ↗
70
/ 100
DVSA MOT (UK Inspections)
Model years 2014–2020 · 2023 report · n=34015
34,015 UK MOT tests · overall 12.3% fail rate vs UK fleet baseline
View source ↗
67
/ 100

UK MOT Reliability Detail

Based on 49,132 MOT tests in the UK during the 2024reporting period. Score for each age band reflects this model's fail rate vs the UK-fleet baseline fail rate at the same age — a generation-aware metric.

Age 35 yrs
69
11.3% fail vs 10.9% fleet
28,208 tests
Age 69 yrs
72
18.2% fail vs 19.2% fleet
20,924 tests

Most Common MOT Failure Categories

#1
Joints
3,153
33.7%
#2
Condition
1,895
20.3%
#3
Brake pads
1,571
16.8%
#4
Brake discs
1,532
16.4%
#5
Exhaust system
1,203
12.9%

Categories ranked across all MOT tests of this model in the UK during the 2024period. "Condition" covers cosmetic / wear issues; suspension and braking dominate the rest.

Compare Against Alternatives

See how the Opel Crossland stacks up against direct rivals — same segment, similar price band, side-by-side risk + reliability.

Open the comparison tool →