Reliability Report · Multi-Source Data

Jaguar S-type Reliability

The Jaguar S-type (current generation) scores 75/100 on our composite reliability index — good territory — drawn from DVSA, NHTSA data.

Composite Score
75
/ 100
Good
Sources: DVSA · NHTSA · latest 2026
Market Snapshot
Documented issues0
Listings in catalogue0
Found a listing?
Get a personalized risk + price verdict in 30 seconds.

Reliability by Source

Each independent organization measures reliability differently. TÜV reports inspection defect rates by age band. ADAC reports pan-European breakdowns per 1,000 vehicles. NHTSA aggregates US consumer complaints. DVSA MOT data is the UK fleet's annual safety inspection — every car 3+ years old. Lower variance across sources = higher confidence in the composite.

NHTSA (US Complaints)
Model years 2003–2008 · 2026 report · n=169
169 complaints across 5 sampled year(s); resolved model="S-TYPE"
View source ↗
69
/ 100
DVSA MOT (UK Inspections)
Model years 2004–2009 · 2024 report · n=10754
10,754 UK MOT tests · overall 32.4% fail rate vs UK fleet baseline
View source ↗
77
/ 100
DVSA MOT (UK Inspections)
Model years 2003–2008 · 2023 report · n=9395
9,395 UK MOT tests · overall 32.7% fail rate vs UK fleet baseline
View source ↗
76
/ 100

UK MOT Reliability Detail

Based on 10,754 MOT tests in the UK during the 2024reporting period. Score for each age band reflects this model's fail rate vs the UK-fleet baseline fail rate at the same age — a generation-aware metric.

Age 1520 yrs
77
32.4% fail vs 38.8% fleet
10,754 tests

Most Common MOT Failure Categories

#1
Ball joint dust cover
11,497
48.3%
#2
Track rod end
5,062
21.3%
#3
Linkage ball joint dust cover
3,267
13.7%
#4
Headlamp
2,136
9.0%
#5
Headlamp aim
1,817
7.6%

Categories ranked across all MOT tests of this model in the UK during the 2024period. "Condition" covers cosmetic / wear issues; suspension and braking dominate the rest.

Compare Against Alternatives

See how the Jaguar S-type stacks up against direct rivals — same segment, similar price band, side-by-side risk + reliability.

Open the comparison tool →